Benefits and Pay

I find it very interesting that most of the working population would say that their pay is the biggest factor that contributes to them either staying or leaving a job. While pay is a very good way that companies can show appreciation for employees and retain current employees, it is not the only way. There are many benefits that companies can give to their employees that foster appreciation, growth, dedication, and ultimately profits for the company.

Oddly enough, many people will place employee pay and other benefits as part of the same category. In most cases they can be separated. Benefits can include any incentives or perks outside regular pay. These benefits can include things that are required by law, flexibility, vacation time, insurance, wellness programs, and other job perks (e.g. free lunch). With all these things that help retain and attract employees,the proper management and execution of these is imperative.

So now I compare these things that I have read about and my real life experiences. I can understand that pay is not the only thing that can help retain employees. Even something as simple as my boss showing appreciation for something that I have done recently goes a long way. For me it makes me want to do even better. I am paid salary plus bonuses, but my pay is not (necessarily) keeping me from finding new employment. It is the benefits that I am receiving that have kept me there long term. I feel that I have learned a lot in my management position. I have become a leader for other stores to follow. I get to work with at great team including those that work with me (my employees) and those that I work with (other managers and my boss). The benefits that I feel that I have at my job only aid me in wanting to perform better for the company. Any world class company will give its employees all the attention, benefits, and pay that they can in order to foster growth and employee loyalty to the company.

A Busy Week

This past week has felt busier than most busy weeks. Any normal week for me involves going to school all day on Tuesdays and Thursdays, going to work an additional 50+ hours throughout the week, while also trying to find time for my wife and little boy. This week I also had a visit from my boss and his boss. Now don't get me wrong, I actually really enjoy my boss. He is fun, smiles, compliments, and gives me business direction. He helps me feel part of a team and appreciates my efforts. When he and his boss visited the store that I manage, I felt... intimidated. My bosses boss (we'll call him Bob) was very "to the point" and "don't say anything nice". My biggest frustration wasn't the fact or how he told us what to do or how a product should be displayed. It was that everything he said was directed only to my boss, not me. I would have thought that sense it was my store that I should have been the one receiving some of the direction.

My boss talked to me after Bob was dropped off at the air port. He told me that all in all the visit was good. He too was frustrated about a few things that Bob said and did, but we also realized that Bob had good things to share with us too.

To relate this to my Human Resource class, we have talked a lot about employee employer relations. Most of what I have learned about world class businesses and their employees is that they show appreciation towards their employees. In contrast, Bob did not display this during his visit... at least not that I saw. I guess that I am glad that I have a good boss who I can enjoy visits with, laugh with, but receive constructive criticism from too.

Progressive Discipline?

John Cambell, an HR guru, spoke to us in class on Tuesday. He started his lecture with a roll play demonstration. He pretended that he has an employee who is being difficult. This employee is always complaining and speaking negatively. As the student in class asked him questions, she asked, “Did you document these conversations? What coaching have you done with him?” John stated that he is tired of dealing with this employee. Tired of him not getting along with John and the other employees.

Most of the time, in John’s experience, the “troubled” employee is a good employee with documented success with the company. So, why is there this difference? How can the supervisor be positively engaged in improving the employee?

One of the ways that a manager can be engaged in improving an employee behavior is with progressive discipline. My original thought of progressive discipline is that it is a warning for the employee - a “one last chance card.” As I learn more about HRs roll, training, and discipline, I am beginning to understand that progressive discipline is not a “one last chance card,” but rather a “hey, this is a concern, this is why, we are documenting it, and what can we do to help you” card. That’s why companies have the verbal warning, written warning, 2^nd written warning, and so on documentation. These progressive disciplines could be a lack of motivation from the employee, ignorance from the employee, or more rarely a blatant decision to disobey. But this brings up a new point. Why would an employee want to be “blatantly” disobedient? I may not fully understand this, but I would assume that it is because they have either given up or they don’t like what is being asked of them. Giving up is a personal issue. Even if you hate your boss, the people you work with, and the work at hand, giving up is still a personal choice… though those things do make it harder to choose not to give up. The other idea, not agreeing with what is being asked of them, would probably be the more common factor for an employee not doing what the company wants. In my experience this employee generally does not agree with what is being asked of them either because they are not comfortable doing it or they do not see/understand the benefit of doing what is asked.

At my job we are asked to talk with our customers about specific things. At first I saw this as a hindrance to my ability to really help my customers with what they need. But that is just the problem… what they need was all I was giving. If I am to excel as a salesman and if the company is going to grow its business (profit) then each customer needs to buy more! Not just the minimum. I know that this seems simple, but in real life not very many businesses actually practice it. I now have a new attitude; my business (personally, my employees, and the company) cannot afford to do the minimum, even if the minimum is of good quality. We need to take every opportunity to bring in more money (more sales).

So to step off my soapbox, my next question is, what do my actions or my employee actions have to do with progressive discipline? The answer – EVERYTHING! Corrective action should not be a means to try and fire an employee. It should be a means to help the troubled employee understand the business they are losing for the company because they are not performing in the expected areas. Progressive discipline should be a training session for the employee and their supervisor – both need to gain from a poor performance issue.

I feel that these ideas have begun to help me become a better manager and hopefully they will also help my employees become better themselves.